Ethical Theories Comparison Chart
| Utilitarianism | Ethical Egoism | Ethics of Care | Kantianism | Prima Facie Duties | Divine Command Theory | Virtue Theory | |
| How is “good” Determined | That everyone should act out the moral good for the good for everyone around. | The individual form maintains that everyone ought to act in my self-interest. | men’s moral attitudes have to do with justice, rights, competition, being independent, and living by rules. | nothing was good in itself except a good will | that all human beings must obey in a general way before any other considerations enter into the picture. | It is morally good if it is commanded by God. | Becoming a certain type of person |
| Most Noted Philosopher(s) | John Stuart Mill | Henry Sidgwick | Carol Gilligan | Immanuel Kant | Sir William David Ross | John Calvin (2012) Wikipedia | Martinaeau |
| Major Strengths | 1.Enough similar human actions. 2.Benefits every one involved | 1.Appears in three forms 2.a philosophical-normative, prescriptive theory | 1.Woman should be generous 2.men should live for justice | 1.Such truths must be logically consistent, not self-contradictory. 2. They also must be universalizable. | 1.always act in accord to duties 2.always act in a way to achieve rightness over wrongness. | 1.judging whether people are moral or immoral. 2.obey a supernatural being | 1.Differentiates the difference between consequential and nonconsequential. 2.rule ethics |
| Major Weaknesses | 1.Danger for the social worth of the individual 2.Does a good end justify to attain it, or should we also consider our motives? | 1.Only applies to one individual 2.Cannot help humanity | 1.Replacing on problematic theory with another. 2.Not talking about gender equality, instead it talks about what jobs should be done by who. | 1.emphasized duties over inclination 2. we must act from a sense of duty rather than from our inclinations | 1.How do we decide if it is Prima Facie Duties. 2.how do we know what takes precedence over the rest. | 1.Atheists couldn’t be moral 2.Agnostics couldn’t be moral | 1.Cannot be determined mathmatically 2. do we have a purpose. |


Leave a comment